Like the proggy/poppy group it documents, Time and a Word: The Yes Story is a bit
schizo. Martin Popoff’s book is part straight-forward timeline, part oral
history. Generally dry and purely informational by nature, time lines are
almost never interesting to read. Chatty, gossipy, and a bit hard to trust,
oral histories are almost always great fun. That means—like Yes’s discography
(sorry, I’ll stop comparing the book to the band)—Time and a Word is enjoyable in fits, but it also lacks the
authorial insight and details that would truly make it “The Yes Story.”
We readers learn the basic beats of the band’s career: the
comings and goings of its multitudinous members, the record releases and the
receptions to those records from both critics and band members, the splits and
reunions right up to 2015. What we don’t learn is much about the people in the
band. Jon Anderson’s spirituality gets discussed quite a bit, but only because
it was so relevant to the music he wrote, and this is really a book about music
not people. Rick Wakeman, the most flamboyant member of the group by some
degree, has no problem exuding his personality regardless of what he’s talking
about. Otherwise, a bunch of guys who critics have often criticized as being
faceless music-bots do not get humanized in any meaningful way. Because those
guys aren’t particularly gossipy, the oral history portions often fail to fill
in the gaps, particularly when dealing with inter-band conflicts. That Popoff’s
writing can be very lively, which is evident from his personal assessments of
the albums the Yes Men made in and outside of the group, makes one wish he’d
tapped into that energy more when explaining the history. Time and a Word could have used a lot more of that kind of
liveliness and insight. As it stands, it kind of reads like box set liner
notes.