With so many episodes, so many themes, so many incarnations, and so much continuing influence over the pop-culture zone, Rod Serling's Twilight Zone is ripe for deep analysis, which is why there has been so much of it. Editors Ron Riekki and Kevin J. Wetmore, Jr., are now dragging in even more by compiling eighteen new essays by various writers in their book The Many Lives of The Twilight Zone: Essays on the Television and Film Franchise.
Showing posts with label Rod Serling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rod Serling. Show all posts
Saturday, October 15, 2022
Wednesday, October 14, 2020
A 'Twilight Zone' Doodle
Here's a little doodle I did to remind you that if you can't think of what to watch this Halloween season, one of the creepier episodes of The Twilight Zone tends to hit the spot. Consider trying "The Dummy", "Living Doll", "The Grave", "Jess-Belle", "The New Exhibit", "To Serve Man", "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet", "The Howling Man", "The Hitch-Hiker","Mirror Image", "It's a Good Life", "The Masks", or "Night Call". Hell... try them all!
Monday, January 27, 2020
Review: 'TV Milestones: The Twilight Zone.'
The Twilight Zone
haunted TV screens long before the concept of auteur TV, and though Rod Serling
was the anthology’s most recognizable face, he did not write every episode. Yet
Barry Keith Grant still makes a fairly solid argument for Serling’s role as auteur
in the new book TV Milestones: The
Twilight Zone. Grant notes how Serling promoted a groundbreaking blend of
traditional genres (sci-fi, horror, noir, fantasy, western) and how his
center-left politics and Hobbesian “world at war” philosophy (art vs. commerce,
individuality vs. conformity, etc.) and willingness to address current events distinguished
The Twilight Zone as much as its
gremlins, Kanamits, and asymmetrical doctors.
I’m no great proponent of the auteur theory, and such a
variety of writing, directing, cinematographic, and acting talent was involved in
The Twilight Zone that it would not be my pick for a prime example of auteur
TV. Yet Grant makes his case sufficiently convincing by emphasizing how much of
its creator went into The Twilight Zone and how unique it was for its time as a result. That kind of focus rather than a more
sweeping analysis is also smart considering how slim these TV milestones books
are. Barry Keith Grant makes good use of his 100 pages.
Tuesday, December 25, 2018
Psychobabble’s 12 Days of X-Mas Episodes: Day 12
Does the mere idea of stepping into another mall, watching It’s a Wonderful Life for the zillionth
time, or talking to your loved ones make you throw up? Then settle your bowlful
of jelly into the La-Z-Boy® and deck your hall with today’s installment of Psychobabble’s 12 Days of X-Mas Episodes instead!
Merry vegetating!
Series: Twilight Zone
Episode: “The Night
of the Meek”, in which a drunken, skinny department store Santa crosses over
into that dimension of both shadow and substance, of things and ideas. Rod
Serling writes one of his finest episodes, capturing the crushing sadness of a
man who cannot deal with society’s endless ills, so he drinks his life away. Art
Carney’s performance is raw with emotion, but also very funny and perfectly
natural. Sadly, this was one of those Twilight Zones shot on video to save
money during the second season, so it looks like crap. But despite the episode’s
aesthetic deficiencies, its humanity and humor still manage to fight through the
fuzz, and if it doesn’t reduce you to a blubbering blob, you might have a serious
dose of Scrooge-itis. Happy holiday!
Saturday, December 1, 2018
Review: 'Superman: The Silver Age Sundays 1959 to 1963'
The Superman comic
strip ran in newspapers daily from 1939 to 1966, so IDW’s latest collection of
them comes close to the end of the run. As early a 1961, you can kind of sense
why a good thing had to wrap up as our hero engages in such inanities as an encounter
with a telepathic dinosaur from space who can transform into a rock and yet
another insulting storyline involving a character who suddenly becomes
overweight.
The silliness of such storylines at least hints that
Superman was still more about unfettered whimsy than punching bad guys in the
face, and that’s a good thing since the strip was always more interesting as a vehicle
for wackiness than as a conventional superhero yarn. A storyline in which Supes
is rapidly promoted through the army because of his unusual abilities is like a
supernatural episode of Sgt. Bilko.
One in which he reveals his longstanding love for a mermaid is both bizarre and
oddly affecting—an epic, interspecies love story. Another takes what may be the
weirdest turn of all when Lois Lane transforms into a bug-eyed alien with
superpowers. Daily Planet Chief Perry White develops superpowers too. Oh, there’s also the one where Superman transforms into a thing with a human body and the head of an ant.
Plus we see Superman face a series of bizarre challenges
from a colony of Amazon women, and Lois Lane believing that her love’s secret
identity is a Rod Serling stand-in! Yet these stories lean on some more tired
devices as once again Superman goes to great lengths to avoid marriage and Lois
once again falls victim to a slightly malicious prank. She just can’t get a
break in these stories.
Superman: The Silver
Age Sundays 1959 to 1963 contains a few clunker plotlines, but for the most
part it delivers the usual fun. And also as usual, it’s a beautifully designed,
full-color package from IDW.
Thursday, October 12, 2017
Review: 'The Twilight Zone Encyclopedia'
The Twilight Zone
ran for 156 episodes written by 40-something different writers and featuring
way more actors and actresses than I’m willing to count. You can literally fill
an encyclopedia with this stuff, and that’s just what Steven Jay Rubin
literally did with The Twilight Zone
Encyclopedia.
Running for 424 packed pages, Rubin’s book discusses every
episode, every writer, every director, every major theme (aliens, children,
time travel, etc.), every significant location or item (Sunnyvale Rest home from
“Kick the Can”, Talky Tina from “Living Doll”, etc.), and nearly every actor
and actress who appeared in the series’
original run (understandably, people like Phil Arnold, who played “Man” in “Mr.
Dingle, the Strong” and Jimmy Baird, who played “Boy” in “The Changing of the
Guard” are a bit too much for our valiant author). And the original run is Rubin’s main concern, which he makes very
clear in his book’s introduction, although he still manages to slip in a good
deal of information about, for example, Twilight
Zone: The Movie in his entry on “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet”.
Rubin doesn’t make room for potential entries about such original
series-related items as all the merchandise The Twilight Zone spawned or The Simpsons’ “Treehouse of Horror” episodes that so wonderfully
parody so many classic Zones, but we
do get a lot that saves the book from being redundant in light of The Twilight Zone Companion, Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a
Television Classic, IMDB, and Wikipedia. There are quotes from new
interviews with a slew of people involved with the original series, odd bits of
trivia (example: Russ Meyer was a still photographer for the series! Nina
Roman-Rhodes, who played the maid in “Miniature”, was one of the few people who
reported seeing a second gunman at the site of JFK’s assassination!), and quite
a few unusual photos (my favorite: Gary Crosby of “Come Wander with Me”
monkeying with an electric bass). Ten pages of Rod Serling’s final interview is
a cool addition too even though the creator barely mentions The Twilight Zone at all.
Monday, October 31, 2016
31 TV Shows for 31 Days of Halloween Season: Day 31
Episode:
“Treehouse of Horror IV”, in which the annual Halloween episode of The
Simpsons hits its peak with a scarifying trio of terror tales presented by
Bart à la Rod Serling on Night Gallery. First
up is a spin on The Devil and Daniel
Webster in which corpulent Homer Simpson barters his soul for one doughnut
and Satan assumes the form of pious neighborino Ned Flanders. Next is the
traditional Twilight Zone parody in which Bart plays a junior Bill Shatner
who discovers a gremlin saboteur messing with his school bus. Finally, there’s the
lavish “Bart Simpson’s Dracula”, in which Count Mr. Burns keeps an undead army
of the undead at the bottom of his Super Happy Fun Slide and neither Francis
Ford Coppola nor Stephen King make it out alive. Back when The Simpsons was
still funny, nobody did Halloween episodes like they did, and no Halloween is
complete without watching one. Happy viewing and happy Halloween!
Monday, October 24, 2016
31 TV Shows for 31 Days of Halloween Season: Day 24
Episode: “Green
Fingers/The Funeral/The Tune in Dan’s Cafe”, in which Cameron Mitchell is a
sleazy industrialist who wants to build a factory on the property of
gardening-enthusiast Elsa Lanchester. Mitchell would have probably backed off
if he’d known just how effective the sweet, old lady’s green fingers are. “Green
Fingers” soars with a macabre script by Rod Serling (based on R.C. Cook’s short
story), creepy direction by John “Saturday Night Fever” Badham, the star of the
greatest monster movie ever made, and an awesome tribute in Siouxsie and the
Banshee’s “Green Fingers” (song not
included in this episode). Our next painting is a morsel of fun silliness
from Richard Matheson in which a vampire plans the funeral he never got a
chance to have. The mourners look like the cast of The Halloween That Almost
Wasn’t. Yay! The portrait at the end of our museum of miscreants depicts Susan
Oliver and Pernell Roberts as a couple incessantly blabbing about their
flailing marriage in a bar while the same crappy country song plays over and
over on the juke box. Apparently, it was the song that was playing when another
doomed couple was swept up in violence at the joint years ago. Despite some
groovy psychedelic solarization effects and an elegantly filmed shoot out, this
last tale is a whole lot of nothing. The other two are essential Halloween
season viewing.
Saturday, October 1, 2016
31 TV Shows for 31 Days of Halloween Season: Day 1
Episode: “Living
Doll”, in which an adorable little girl’s adorable little dolly faces off
against rotten stepdad Telly Savales. The final moments are only rivaled by the
denouement of “The Dummy” for the series’ most frightening scene. The use of
slow motion was most likely a means of stretching out the sequence to fit
Rod Serling’s narration, but it really contributes to the queasily unsettling
atmosphere of a show in which a talking doll manages to slip in phrases like
“You’ll be sorry,” “You better be nice to me,” and “I’m going to kill you” when
she isn’t cooing, “My name is Talky Tina, and I love you very much.” Talky
Tina: she’ll make you pee your pants like Betsy Wetsy.
Friday, January 1, 2016
366 Days at the Drive-In: Day 93
The Date: January
1
Twilight Zone: The
Movie (1983)
What Is It?: Burgess
Meredith takes over for the late Rod Serling as tour guide through a series of
four dimension-busting tales. John Landis and Steven Spielberg’s stink, but Joe
Dante and George Miller’s are most memorable. Landis’s wrap-around starring Dan
Aykroyd and Albert Brooks is great too…especially if you want to see something really scary…
Why Today?: Since
1995, the Sci-Fi channel (now known as Syfy, which is apparently some sort of
sexually transmitted disease) has been hosting a “Twilight Zone” marathon that
gets started on New Year’s Eve and keeps rocking into the following day.
Monday, May 19, 2014
The Mother of Sci-Fi Movie Franchises Was Also the Darkest
Warning: The Spoilers
will damn you all to hell.
Star Wars gets all
the credit for being the first major science-fiction movie franchise, segueing
off into a plastic avalanche of every product imaginable from the ubiquitous
toys to clothing, house wares, books, hygiene products, food, and so on and so on.
First appearing a decade before George Lucas’s juggernaut, Planet of the Apes wasn’t quite as over-commercialized as its
successor (what is?), but kids could still get their paws on a plethora of Apey
action figures, mugs and bowls, t-shirts, comics, puzzles, piggy banks, Ben
Cooper Halloween costumes, and so on. They could also get a healthy dose of
harsh reality by actually watching the movies. Forget Darth Vader’s
traumatizing revelation in The Empire
Strikes Back and even all the skin-charring nastiness and off-screen
“youngling” killing of Revenge of the
Sith. The Planet of the Apes
series is by far the darkest, downright cruelest film franchise ever pitched at
kids.
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Review: 'Steven Spielberg and Duel: The Making of a Film Career'
By the fourth quarter of the twentieth century, TV had
overtaken movies as America’s number one entertainment for good, so it is fitting
that the number one moviemaker of that period got his start on the little
screen. Steven Spielberg was a TV junkie who’d made his name directing episodes
of “Marcus Welby, M.D.”, “Columbo”, and most famously, “Rod Serling’s Night
Gallery” when he was still barely old enough to drink. In 1971, he got his
first break into feature-length movie making, though Duel was consigned to his usual living room-based medium. Spielberg’s
ABC movie-of-the-week adaptation of Richard Matheson’s short story, however,
revealed a big screen talent. This brutally minimalistic showdown between a
suburban schlub and a literal monster truck was filmed with all the
consideration and imagination of a major motion picture. That may not sound
like a big deal in the day of “Mad Men” and “Game of Thrones”, but it was
completely revolutionary in an age when TV movies were low-budget, disposable
filler between episodes of “The Brady Bunch” and “The Courtship of Eddie’s
Father”. In fact, Duel was so high
quality that it earned a critically smashing feature run in Europe. Spielberg’s
career as a TV director was coming to an end.
Duel is not
generally mentioned among Spielberg’s signature films, but based on this above brief
history, I’m sure you’ll understand its significance. If you need any further
convincing, check out Steven Awalt’s excellent new book Steven Spielberg and Duel: The Making of a Film Career. Awalt gets
deep into this film’s creation, from the inspiration for and publication of
Matheson’s story to the film’s eventual American theatrical run in 1983 in the
wake of Spielberg’s domination of cinemas with E.T. The history is complete, amusing (the “casting” of the
automobiles is documented here, as is the Incredible Hulk’s theft of Duel footage), critical (though mostly
of Awalt’s fellow Duel theorists), and
often just as thrilling as the film it details. The author relates Matheson’s
near-death experience that inspired his tale and Spielberg’s boyhood short
movie about a head-on collision between model trains with a master
storyteller’s grasp of suspense. He also really emphasizes the importance of
master storyteller Richard Matheson in this history. Because Duel is so significant a milestone in
Spielberg’s career, Matheson’s major role in its creation is often minimized.
Not so in this book, which also contains that writer’s complete teleplay for
his and Spielberg’s film. So this book functions as both an informative—and
very entertaining—resource for students of Spielberg and a nice tribute to the
recently deceased Richard Matheson.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
21 Underrated Episodes of “The Twilight Zone” You Need to Watch Now!
“Time Enough at Last”… “The Eye of the Beholder” … “To Serve
Man” … “The Monsters are Due on Maple Street” … “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet”…
You don’t have to be a “Twilight Zone” freak to be familiar
with every twist and turn these episodes take. They are among the 35 or 40
shows that have found a place in Rod Serling’s canon of classics. But what of
the other 120-something episodes? Surely there are a few
should-have-been-classics in that bunch.
There are, and the following episodes may be good next steps
to take after watching “The Howling Man,” “The After Hours,” “Walking
Distance,” and the others that have found permanent places in annual “Twilight
Zone” marathons or have been parodied on “The Simpsons.” So I now submit for
your approval 21 Underrated Episodes of
“The Twilight Zone” You Need to Watch Now!
(Read cautiously... here there be spoilers)
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Twilight Zone A - Z
“The Twilight Zone” was often directed with great artistry, but like most fine television series, it was a writer’s show. Struggling in a medium still regarded as lowbrow, head writer Rod Serling did much to bring credibility to T.V. writing. In the brief teasers he’d film to set up the following week’s show, Serling often gave featured credit to the writer. His very appearance in these pieces and his famed introductions at the head of most episodes highlighted the starring roles writers played in “The Twilight Zone”. Serling chose some of the very best sci-fi and fantasy authors to assist him in realizing his series.
From the series’ very beginning, Richard Matheson was among the most prolific “Twilight Zone” contributors. His involvement was a true coup considering the impressive bibliography he’d been building since the start of the ‘50s: the tremendously influential apocalyptic horror novel I Am Legend, The Incredible Shrinking Man, the short stories “Death Ship”, “Little Girl Lost”, “Long Distance Call” and “Steel”, all of which he’d adapt for “The Twilight Zone”. Matheson’s “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” was a rare moment of greatness in the series’ uneven final season. Charles Beaumont would do the same for his short classics such as “The Man Who Made Himself” (adapted as “In His Image”), “Perchance to Dream”, “The Howling Man”, and “The Devil, You Say?” (adapted as “Printer’s Devil”), while also contributing such first-rate original scripts as “Long Live Walter Jameson” and “Miniature”. Having also devised the story that would become “Living Doll”, Beaumont was responsible for some of the series’ most frightening pieces. George Clayton Johnson’s scripts and stories were fewer, but the humanity of “A Penny for Your Thoughts”, “Nothing in the Dark”, “Kick the Can”, “The Prime Mover”, and “A Game of Pool” has earned him a place among the most memorable authors who’ve passed through “The Twilight Zone”.
Serling’s work with one of his favorite genre writers didn’t go quite as smoothly as his collaborations with Matheson, Beaumont, and Johnson. He admired Ray Bradbury enough to pay tribute to the author with sly references in “Walking Distance”, “A Stop at Willoughby”, and “Will the Real Martian Please Stand Up”, but the men’s working relationship was troubled. Serling wanted Bradbury to contribute scripts from the show’s conception. Bradbury was excited by that prospect. Once the series went into production, Bradbury began accusing Serling of plagiarism in private, citing “Walking Distance” among those he found a bit too Bradbury-esque. Serling later rejected Bradbury’s elaborate first script, “Here There Be Tygers”, for budgetary reasons. “A Miracle of Rare Device” met a similar fate. In the end, only the author’s “I Sing the Body Electric” made it to “The Twilight Zone”, only achieving that after two years of revisions and polite criticisms from Serling. Bradbury’s tale of a robotic grandmother was sweet enough, but failed to capture the heart or awe of the series’ classics. The writer’s stay in the Zone ended there.
Serling and his gang also adapted several stories by outside writers that achieved their greatest renown as locations in “The Twilight Zone”: Lynn Venable’s “Time Enough at Last”, Jerome Bixby’s “It’s a Good Life”, Damon Knight’s “To Serve Man”. Ironically, Serling’s love of prose and talent for screenwriting never translated to success as a writer of short stories or novels outside the television universe he created.
Much of the “Twilight Zone” magic radiates from the deep sense of nostalgia in so many of Rod Serling’s scripts. Rarely was this feeling more palpable than in the series’ fifth episode. In “Walking Distance”, a harried ad man steps through a time portal and returns to his childhood hometown where band concerts are still a summertime staple and the neighborhood carousel still spins. The fictional town of Homewood in “Walking Distance” is a thinly veiled stand-in for Serling’s own hometown of Binghamton. No doubt the hectic schedule of running and writing “The Twilight Zone” left him longing for the laziness of that burg in Broome County, New York. Further inspiration struck when he noticed how similar the back lot at MGM was to his boyhood stomping ground. The carousel is a particularly telling touch as Broome County’s signature landmarks are its six antique merry-go-rounds.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Richard Matheson On Screen: 10 Essential Works
Throughout 20th century horror’s Pre-K era (i.e.: pre-King), Richard Matheson dominated. Matheson is a tough, clean writer who has composed some of our most unforgettable works of terror and imagination. Without the ornateness of plot and/or language that distinguished his major horror peers—Poe and Lovecraft, Bradbury and King—Matheson writes tales with the punchy immediacy of campfire ghost stories. A scant phrase can instantly conjure one of the many indelible images he created: a man shrinks toward oblivion, a gremlin terrorizes a man from the wing of a plane, a murderous fetish doll stalks a woman through her apartment, a monstrous big-rig hunts a motorist, the last man on Earth fights to survive a plague of vampires.
Matheson’s lean, pointed stories were absolutely ripe for adaptation. His short stories resulted in several of the most beloved episodes of “Twilight Zone”, although oddly enough, there has never been a truly great version of what may be his definitive work, the apocalyptic vampire novel I Am Legend. Be that as it may, there are still plenty of wonderful examples of Matheson on-screen. Here are ten essentials.
(For the purposes of this article, I steered away from Matheson's adaptations of other writers' work, but his scripts for Poe's Fall of the House of Usher and Dennis Wheatley's The Devil Rides Out are pretty essential viewing, too)
1. The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)
(For the purposes of this article, I steered away from Matheson's adaptations of other writers' work, but his scripts for Poe's Fall of the House of Usher and Dennis Wheatley's The Devil Rides Out are pretty essential viewing, too)
1. The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)
Sunday, July 25, 2010
October 6, 2009: Things That Scare Me: Case Study #9
In spite of (or, perhaps, because of) my adult infatuation with all things horrifying and horrific, I was scared of absolutely everything when I was a kid. A television commercial for a horror movie was enough to send me racing from the den in a sweaty-palm panic. In this ongoing series here on Psychobabble, I've been reviewing some of the things that most traumatized me as a child and evaluating whether or not I was rightfully frightened or just a wiener.
Case Study #9: The prologue of Twilight Zone: The Movie
In keeping with the ongoing Twilight Zone 50th Anniversary festivities here at Psychobabble, I’m going to delve into one of the more embarrassing installments of “Things That Scare Me.” “Embarrassing?” you ask. “But I too found the opening sequence of Twilight Zone: The Movie terrifying when I was five-years old!” OK. Mistake number one: I was not five-years old when I saw Twilight Zone: The Movie. I was nine or ten, which is well out of the range of acceptability. I mean, this sequence is surely one of the better things in the very hit-and-miss big screen adaptation of Rod Serling’s great series (George Miller’s remake of “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet”? Hit! Steven Spielberg’s remake of “Kick the Can”? Great big stinking miss!). But scary? I don’t know. Judge for yourself with your jaded, 21st century eyes.
The scariest thing about this is the build up: Dan Aykroyd asking Albert Brooks if he wants to “see something reeeeally scary.” Nice establishment of suspense, director John Landis! Too bad you didn’t bring a similarly deft hand to your lame full-length segment in the film, which finds racist Vic Morrow trotting through history as the victim of various violent bigots (I’m not getting into the whole death controversy thing here, though). The problem is that the pay-off is weak: Aykroyd turns into a demon, growls like a cougar, and strangles Brooks. Thud. Still, many people profess to having been scared by this scene as kids, so perhaps I shouldn’t flagellate myself too much.
But then again, maybe I should. And this brings us to mistake number two: I wasn’t actually scared by watching this scene. You see, my mother was the one who watched it. I asked her what happened in the movie, and she began to explain this opening sequence in intricate detail. Once she got to the “You wanna see something really scary” part, my terror had apparently become so palpable that she halted the story, perhaps out of concern that I might piss the bed that night. But that was a bad move on her part, as my overactive nine-year old imagination commenced completing this scene with every horrible horror it could conjure. Had she simply said “Akyroyd turns into a cougar monster and throttles Albert Brooks,” I think I would have slept quite soundly that night. Instead, I had the fear something awful.
The Verdict: Obviously, I lose considerable points for being frightened of something I hadn’t actually seen. But let’s not underestimate the power of oral-storytelling, which utilizes the listener’s imagination in a way that no film could (The Blair Witch Project excluded). The fact that my mother didn’t finish telling me what happened at the beginning of Twilight Zone: The Movie left even more room for my imagination to go nutty. When I finally watched the movie, I was pretty unaffected by it, so I think I score some points for that. Perhaps the bottom line is that I was nine, though. That’s too old to get spooked by an unfinished story told by my fucking mommy. What a wiener.
Case Study #9: The prologue of Twilight Zone: The Movie
In keeping with the ongoing Twilight Zone 50th Anniversary festivities here at Psychobabble, I’m going to delve into one of the more embarrassing installments of “Things That Scare Me.” “Embarrassing?” you ask. “But I too found the opening sequence of Twilight Zone: The Movie terrifying when I was five-years old!” OK. Mistake number one: I was not five-years old when I saw Twilight Zone: The Movie. I was nine or ten, which is well out of the range of acceptability. I mean, this sequence is surely one of the better things in the very hit-and-miss big screen adaptation of Rod Serling’s great series (George Miller’s remake of “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet”? Hit! Steven Spielberg’s remake of “Kick the Can”? Great big stinking miss!). But scary? I don’t know. Judge for yourself with your jaded, 21st century eyes.
The scariest thing about this is the build up: Dan Aykroyd asking Albert Brooks if he wants to “see something reeeeally scary.” Nice establishment of suspense, director John Landis! Too bad you didn’t bring a similarly deft hand to your lame full-length segment in the film, which finds racist Vic Morrow trotting through history as the victim of various violent bigots (I’m not getting into the whole death controversy thing here, though). The problem is that the pay-off is weak: Aykroyd turns into a demon, growls like a cougar, and strangles Brooks. Thud. Still, many people profess to having been scared by this scene as kids, so perhaps I shouldn’t flagellate myself too much.
But then again, maybe I should. And this brings us to mistake number two: I wasn’t actually scared by watching this scene. You see, my mother was the one who watched it. I asked her what happened in the movie, and she began to explain this opening sequence in intricate detail. Once she got to the “You wanna see something really scary” part, my terror had apparently become so palpable that she halted the story, perhaps out of concern that I might piss the bed that night. But that was a bad move on her part, as my overactive nine-year old imagination commenced completing this scene with every horrible horror it could conjure. Had she simply said “Akyroyd turns into a cougar monster and throttles Albert Brooks,” I think I would have slept quite soundly that night. Instead, I had the fear something awful.
The Verdict: Obviously, I lose considerable points for being frightened of something I hadn’t actually seen. But let’s not underestimate the power of oral-storytelling, which utilizes the listener’s imagination in a way that no film could (The Blair Witch Project excluded). The fact that my mother didn’t finish telling me what happened at the beginning of Twilight Zone: The Movie left even more room for my imagination to go nutty. When I finally watched the movie, I was pretty unaffected by it, so I think I score some points for that. Perhaps the bottom line is that I was nine, though. That’s too old to get spooked by an unfinished story told by my fucking mommy. What a wiener.
September 28, 2009: 50 Years of “The Twilight Zone”
On this coming Friday in 1959, at 10:00 PM Eastern Time, on the CBS network, “The Twilight Zone” debuted, and television was changed forever. By far the smartest series to enjoy a successful run on American television at that point in the medium’s brief history, “The Twilight Zone” sharpened the suspense anthology series already introduced by “Alfred Hitchcock Presents” and “One Step Beyond” immeasurably. Episodes of those two pioneering programs tended to be heavy on the flab, light on the satisfying conclusions, and weak in the directorial department (except, of course, when Hitchcock was at the helm). “The Twilight Zone” certainly had its share of weak episodes, but the great ones were dazzling unions of cinematic direction, masterful acting, and well-paced, pointed scripts (with the occasional mind-blowing resolution).
Although Rod Serling constantly protested that he never intended to use “The Twilight Zone” as a platform for social commentary, I find it hard to believe that this very smart fellow didn’t realize that a supernatural program could be a cagey Trojan Horse in which he could smuggle storylines about racism, the insanity of war, the shallowness of consumerism and capitalism, anti-Semitism and the Holocaust, nuclear war, and Fascism onto conservative, late ‘50s/early ‘60s network TV. The political progressiveness of “The Twilight Zone” is just as much of a factor in its deathlessness as the way it could chill one’s bones. I greatly believe that terror is difficult to maintain in lengthy doses, which is why a pithy ghost story is infinitely more frightening than any 900-page Stephen King novel. The creepiest episodes of “The Twilight Zone” had the same concise power to terrorize, and as crude as the show could be in comparison to what can be achieved in modern cinema, I find certain episodes of “The Twilight Zone” to be among the most frightening “movies” I’ve ever seen (just thinking about the denouements of “The Dummy” and “Living Doll” are still enough to send me running for the nightlight). “The Twilight Zone” could also be deeply moving, and while it didn’t always do humor well, there are some neat exceptions, such as “Will the Real Martian Please Stand Up”, “The Mind and the Matter”, and “A Penny for Your Thoughts”. None of these episodes are laugh-out-loud hilarious, but they’re all fine installments for their witty plots and twists.
Whether “The Twilight Zone” intended to be funny or frightening, heart rendering or socially critical, it was almost always innovative, intellectually electrifying entertainment. Very few shows from its era hold up, making the 50th anniversary of “The Twilight Zone” a true landmark to celebrate. I recommend you do so by watching some of your most-loved episodes. If you’re a “Zone” novice, here are my ten personal favorites (in chronological order) to get you started:
1. “Time Enough at Last” (original air date: November 20, 1959)
No matter how many times I see this tragic tale of bookworm Henry Beamish, my heart still breaks for the poor schmuck. This has as much to do with an extraordinary performance by Burgess Meredith as it does with Serling’s outstanding adaptation of Lynn Venable’s story.
2. “The After Hours” (original air date: June 10, 1960)
Sweet and sad, but also really unsettling. That “Marsha! Marsha! Come off it, Marsha!” scene is nightmare material. Anne Francis also has the distinction of being the most compelling actress ever to appear on “The Twilight Zone”.
3. “The Howling Man” (original air date: November 4, 1960)
A wonderful blend of the absurd (those insane brethren with their Moses beards!) and the horrific (Look out! You’ve unleashed Satan!) by Charles Beaumont, one of the Zone’s most prolific and skilled writers.
4. “Eye of the Beholder” (original air date: November 11, 1960)
“Eye of the Beholder” has lost a little power due to its over-reliance on a twist ending, but it will always rate as one of “The Twilight Zone’s” finest moments because of a great co-performance from Maxine Stuart and Donna Douglas, the arresting make-up, and the brilliant way director Douglas Heyes misdirects the viewer.
5. “It’s a Good Life” (original air date: November 3, 1961)
Like anyone needed another reason to find children totally creepy. “It’s a Good Life” is the story of Anthony Fremont, a freckle-faced cutie pie with more power than any child—or adult—should possess. I always wondered why we don’t get a good look at the two-headed gopher Anthony conjures in the beginning of the episode. According to Bill Mumy (who played Anthony) in Martin Grams Jr.’s indispensable book The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic
, we may have only gotten to see the gopher’s tale because the creature “was too disgusting and they probably feared repercussion from viewers.” Man oh man, I’ve never wanted to see that gopher as much as I do now.
6. “To Serve Man” (original air date: March 2, 1962)
While its brilliant twist is the greatest legacy of “To Serve Man”, it’s not nearly as disturbing as the image of Richard Kiel with his mouth hanging open as an incongruously amiable voice speaks his dialogue.
7. “The Dummy” (original air date: May 4, 1962)
Nothing is scarier than breaking the fourth wall (i.e.: when a character in a film looks directly into the camera, creating an unexpectedly personal connection with the viewer). This happens in a terrifying way at the conclusion of “The Dummy”, making for one of the most unforgettable moments in “The Twilight Zone”. You may want to forget it, but you won’t.
8. “Jess-Belle” (original air date: February 14, 1963)
One of the few great episodes from the “The Twilight Zone’s” hit-or-miss fourth season in which the show was stretched to an hour-long. There is no shocking twist, socio/political message, or cavalcade of chills in “Jess-Belle”; it’s simply a wonderfully spun yarn with impeccable performances from Anne Francis as the titular heartsick witch, Jeanette Nolan as the self-delighted Granny who bewitched her, and James Best as the object of Jess’s obsession. For its flawless acting, atmosphere, imagination, and pathos, “Jess-Belle” is my favorite episode of “The Twilight Zone”, even though it is so atypical of the series that it’s the only one that does not end with a parting monologue from Serling.
9. “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” (original air date: October 11, 1963)
The gremlin looks like a giant teddy bear with a harelip, so why is that reveal when Bill Shatner pulls aside the curtain still so horrifying? Probably because of the relentless white-knuckle tension that precedes (and follows) the scene.
10. “Living Doll” (original air date: November 1, 1963)
Tell Savalas goes toe-to-toe with Talky Tina. The final moments of this episode are among the most frightening in the “Twilight Zone” canon. I’m sure the decision to use slow motion was a means of stretching out the sequence to fit Serling’s narration, but it really contributes to the queasily disturbing atmosphere. “Living Doll” is “The Twilight Zone” at its most terrifying, which means it’s TV at its most terrifying.
For those who are a bit more “Twilight Zone” savvy, here are 5 of the most underrated episodes.
1. “The Lateness of the Hour” (original air date: December 12, 1960)
During the second season, the Powers That Be at CBS tried to save cash by having the TZ crew film six episodes on inexpensive video rather than film. Serling was adamantly opposed, but he relented. The experiment was an absolute failure. Grainy, flat video did nothing to convey the rich, shadowy atmosphere that made “The Twilight Zone” an aesthetic triumph as well as a triumph of storytelling. This was particularly unfortunate considering that a few truly fine stories were captured in this subpar format, including “The Lateness of the Hour”, a creepy story about a wealthy inventor who populates his home with robot servants. The ending is a bit predictable (especially if you’re familiar with the standard “Twilight Zone” 9th-inning twist), but it is handled in a way that still makes it shocking with each subsequent viewing.
2. “The Prime Mover” (original air date: March, 24 1961)
One of the better humorous episodes, “The Prime Mover” stars Buddy Ebsen of “The Beverly Hillbillies” as a barback who develops telekinetic powers after getting zapped by a fallen power line. His asshole boss then schemes to exploit Ebsen’s newfound abilities by taking him to Vegas to ace the craps tables. The piece is terrific because Ebsen brings a nice mixture of selfless agreeability and conscience to his performance, so it’s a real pleasure when he gets the last laugh.
3. “Long Distance Call” (original air date: March 31, 1961)
The crew seemed to be getting a better handle on their video equipment by the time they shot “Long Distance Call”, because it looks better than the other episodes shot on tape. But this is yet another show that derives its power more from story than presentation. On his way to being typecast as a creepy kid, Billy Mumy plays a little boy whose grandmother gives him a toy telephone for his birthday. After Grandma croaks, she and her grandson start chatting on the phony phone. The premise and Mumy’s performance would make this one of the more unsettling “Twilight Zone” episodes on their own, but when coupled with the truly fucked-up things Granny says during their conversations, you have one of the most demented 30 minutes of television ever aired.
4. “Printer’s Devil” (original air date: February 28, 1963)
Burgess Meredith was an actor so integral to “The Twilight Zone” (he starred in a record four episodes) that when Steven Spielberg produced Twilight Zone: The Movie in 1983, he was chosen to succeed the late Rod Serling as narrator. Hardly as well-remembered as “Time Enough at Last”, “Printer’s Devil” is a hidden treat for Meredith fans, who had come to love him for his good-natured, everyman characters. But here he is as cast as the villain—in fact, he is cast as the ultimate villain: Satan. Shades of his future work as The Penguin on the “Batman” series peep through as Meredith helps a flailing newspaper owner get back in business by creating sensational headlines (“HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EXPOSED AS BIGAMIST!”). Another great episode from the 60-minute “Twilight Zone”.
5. “On Thursday We Leave for Home” (original air date: March 2, 1963)
Here’s another hour-long “Zone”, and it’s the one that Serling said was the only “really effective show” in the extended format. He was being more than a bit unfair to other excellent episodes, such as the aforementioned “Jess-Belle” and “Printer’s Devil”, as well as “Miniature”, and “The Incredible World of Horace Ford”, but there’s no mystery about why he singled out “On Thursday We Leave for Home” (aside from the fact that he wrote it). Thirty years before the show begins, a spaceship crashed on a barren planet with two suns and the ship’s captain is tasked with maintaining order among the survivors, none of whom remember Earth. As the throng grows mutinous, the Captain fears his control over them may be in jeopardy. “On Thursday We Leave for Home” is classic “Twilight Zone” in its delivery of a moral message, its slow-mounting tension, and its chilling conclusion. A forgotten episode that deserves to be remembered among the classics.
Although Rod Serling constantly protested that he never intended to use “The Twilight Zone” as a platform for social commentary, I find it hard to believe that this very smart fellow didn’t realize that a supernatural program could be a cagey Trojan Horse in which he could smuggle storylines about racism, the insanity of war, the shallowness of consumerism and capitalism, anti-Semitism and the Holocaust, nuclear war, and Fascism onto conservative, late ‘50s/early ‘60s network TV. The political progressiveness of “The Twilight Zone” is just as much of a factor in its deathlessness as the way it could chill one’s bones. I greatly believe that terror is difficult to maintain in lengthy doses, which is why a pithy ghost story is infinitely more frightening than any 900-page Stephen King novel. The creepiest episodes of “The Twilight Zone” had the same concise power to terrorize, and as crude as the show could be in comparison to what can be achieved in modern cinema, I find certain episodes of “The Twilight Zone” to be among the most frightening “movies” I’ve ever seen (just thinking about the denouements of “The Dummy” and “Living Doll” are still enough to send me running for the nightlight). “The Twilight Zone” could also be deeply moving, and while it didn’t always do humor well, there are some neat exceptions, such as “Will the Real Martian Please Stand Up”, “The Mind and the Matter”, and “A Penny for Your Thoughts”. None of these episodes are laugh-out-loud hilarious, but they’re all fine installments for their witty plots and twists.
Whether “The Twilight Zone” intended to be funny or frightening, heart rendering or socially critical, it was almost always innovative, intellectually electrifying entertainment. Very few shows from its era hold up, making the 50th anniversary of “The Twilight Zone” a true landmark to celebrate. I recommend you do so by watching some of your most-loved episodes. If you’re a “Zone” novice, here are my ten personal favorites (in chronological order) to get you started:
1. “Time Enough at Last” (original air date: November 20, 1959)
No matter how many times I see this tragic tale of bookworm Henry Beamish, my heart still breaks for the poor schmuck. This has as much to do with an extraordinary performance by Burgess Meredith as it does with Serling’s outstanding adaptation of Lynn Venable’s story.
2. “The After Hours” (original air date: June 10, 1960)
Sweet and sad, but also really unsettling. That “Marsha! Marsha! Come off it, Marsha!” scene is nightmare material. Anne Francis also has the distinction of being the most compelling actress ever to appear on “The Twilight Zone”.
3. “The Howling Man” (original air date: November 4, 1960)
A wonderful blend of the absurd (those insane brethren with their Moses beards!) and the horrific (Look out! You’ve unleashed Satan!) by Charles Beaumont, one of the Zone’s most prolific and skilled writers.
4. “Eye of the Beholder” (original air date: November 11, 1960)
“Eye of the Beholder” has lost a little power due to its over-reliance on a twist ending, but it will always rate as one of “The Twilight Zone’s” finest moments because of a great co-performance from Maxine Stuart and Donna Douglas, the arresting make-up, and the brilliant way director Douglas Heyes misdirects the viewer.
5. “It’s a Good Life” (original air date: November 3, 1961)
Like anyone needed another reason to find children totally creepy. “It’s a Good Life” is the story of Anthony Fremont, a freckle-faced cutie pie with more power than any child—or adult—should possess. I always wondered why we don’t get a good look at the two-headed gopher Anthony conjures in the beginning of the episode. According to Bill Mumy (who played Anthony) in Martin Grams Jr.’s indispensable book The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic
6. “To Serve Man” (original air date: March 2, 1962)
While its brilliant twist is the greatest legacy of “To Serve Man”, it’s not nearly as disturbing as the image of Richard Kiel with his mouth hanging open as an incongruously amiable voice speaks his dialogue.
7. “The Dummy” (original air date: May 4, 1962)
Nothing is scarier than breaking the fourth wall (i.e.: when a character in a film looks directly into the camera, creating an unexpectedly personal connection with the viewer). This happens in a terrifying way at the conclusion of “The Dummy”, making for one of the most unforgettable moments in “The Twilight Zone”. You may want to forget it, but you won’t.
8. “Jess-Belle” (original air date: February 14, 1963)
One of the few great episodes from the “The Twilight Zone’s” hit-or-miss fourth season in which the show was stretched to an hour-long. There is no shocking twist, socio/political message, or cavalcade of chills in “Jess-Belle”; it’s simply a wonderfully spun yarn with impeccable performances from Anne Francis as the titular heartsick witch, Jeanette Nolan as the self-delighted Granny who bewitched her, and James Best as the object of Jess’s obsession. For its flawless acting, atmosphere, imagination, and pathos, “Jess-Belle” is my favorite episode of “The Twilight Zone”, even though it is so atypical of the series that it’s the only one that does not end with a parting monologue from Serling.
9. “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” (original air date: October 11, 1963)
The gremlin looks like a giant teddy bear with a harelip, so why is that reveal when Bill Shatner pulls aside the curtain still so horrifying? Probably because of the relentless white-knuckle tension that precedes (and follows) the scene.
10. “Living Doll” (original air date: November 1, 1963)
Tell Savalas goes toe-to-toe with Talky Tina. The final moments of this episode are among the most frightening in the “Twilight Zone” canon. I’m sure the decision to use slow motion was a means of stretching out the sequence to fit Serling’s narration, but it really contributes to the queasily disturbing atmosphere. “Living Doll” is “The Twilight Zone” at its most terrifying, which means it’s TV at its most terrifying.
For those who are a bit more “Twilight Zone” savvy, here are 5 of the most underrated episodes.
1. “The Lateness of the Hour” (original air date: December 12, 1960)
During the second season, the Powers That Be at CBS tried to save cash by having the TZ crew film six episodes on inexpensive video rather than film. Serling was adamantly opposed, but he relented. The experiment was an absolute failure. Grainy, flat video did nothing to convey the rich, shadowy atmosphere that made “The Twilight Zone” an aesthetic triumph as well as a triumph of storytelling. This was particularly unfortunate considering that a few truly fine stories were captured in this subpar format, including “The Lateness of the Hour”, a creepy story about a wealthy inventor who populates his home with robot servants. The ending is a bit predictable (especially if you’re familiar with the standard “Twilight Zone” 9th-inning twist), but it is handled in a way that still makes it shocking with each subsequent viewing.
2. “The Prime Mover” (original air date: March, 24 1961)
One of the better humorous episodes, “The Prime Mover” stars Buddy Ebsen of “The Beverly Hillbillies” as a barback who develops telekinetic powers after getting zapped by a fallen power line. His asshole boss then schemes to exploit Ebsen’s newfound abilities by taking him to Vegas to ace the craps tables. The piece is terrific because Ebsen brings a nice mixture of selfless agreeability and conscience to his performance, so it’s a real pleasure when he gets the last laugh.
3. “Long Distance Call” (original air date: March 31, 1961)
The crew seemed to be getting a better handle on their video equipment by the time they shot “Long Distance Call”, because it looks better than the other episodes shot on tape. But this is yet another show that derives its power more from story than presentation. On his way to being typecast as a creepy kid, Billy Mumy plays a little boy whose grandmother gives him a toy telephone for his birthday. After Grandma croaks, she and her grandson start chatting on the phony phone. The premise and Mumy’s performance would make this one of the more unsettling “Twilight Zone” episodes on their own, but when coupled with the truly fucked-up things Granny says during their conversations, you have one of the most demented 30 minutes of television ever aired.
4. “Printer’s Devil” (original air date: February 28, 1963)
Burgess Meredith was an actor so integral to “The Twilight Zone” (he starred in a record four episodes) that when Steven Spielberg produced Twilight Zone: The Movie in 1983, he was chosen to succeed the late Rod Serling as narrator. Hardly as well-remembered as “Time Enough at Last”, “Printer’s Devil” is a hidden treat for Meredith fans, who had come to love him for his good-natured, everyman characters. But here he is as cast as the villain—in fact, he is cast as the ultimate villain: Satan. Shades of his future work as The Penguin on the “Batman” series peep through as Meredith helps a flailing newspaper owner get back in business by creating sensational headlines (“HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EXPOSED AS BIGAMIST!”). Another great episode from the 60-minute “Twilight Zone”.
5. “On Thursday We Leave for Home” (original air date: March 2, 1963)
Here’s another hour-long “Zone”, and it’s the one that Serling said was the only “really effective show” in the extended format. He was being more than a bit unfair to other excellent episodes, such as the aforementioned “Jess-Belle” and “Printer’s Devil”, as well as “Miniature”, and “The Incredible World of Horace Ford”, but there’s no mystery about why he singled out “On Thursday We Leave for Home” (aside from the fact that he wrote it). Thirty years before the show begins, a spaceship crashed on a barren planet with two suns and the ship’s captain is tasked with maintaining order among the survivors, none of whom remember Earth. As the throng grows mutinous, the Captain fears his control over them may be in jeopardy. “On Thursday We Leave for Home” is classic “Twilight Zone” in its delivery of a moral message, its slow-mounting tension, and its chilling conclusion. A forgotten episode that deserves to be remembered among the classics.
June 16, 2009: Psychobabble recommends The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic
I’d been meaning to dive into The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic ever since OTR Publishing put it out last September. Having finally got my clutches on a copy of this potentially daunting, nearly 800-page tome, I was further daunted by Martin Grams, Jr.'s introduction to the book. He promises that it will not be a platform for personal opinion about all of those weird, wondrous, (and sometimes weak) episodes of “The Twilight Zone”. Rather he wrote it as a definitive reference guide full of carefully researched facts and figures, clearly irritated by the numerous “Zone” books that apparently got the details wrong. 800 pages of facts and figures? Sounds like a blast.
Fortunately, The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic actually is a blast. While I can’t (and wouldn’t want to) fathom the kind of fan who needs to know the brand of typewriter ribbon Rod Serling used, I can’t imagine one who won’t find much of this information fresh and fascinating. In keeping with his neutral approach, Grams’s text is generally pretty dry and academic, but there is plenty of color to be found. Serling’s heated correspondences with writers Charles Beaumont (who accuses the man of plagiarism) and Ray Bradbury (who bitches about rewrites of his script for “I Sing the Body Electric”) are more dramatic than a thousand reality show slap fights and they really draw attention to how underappreciated Serling was in his own camp.

The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic is divided into two parts, the first being a linear history of the program, the second being an exhaustively detailed episode guide (although I was disappointed by the cursory treatment a couple of my favorite episodes received, most notably the fantastic “Jess-Belle” from season four). Along the way, readers are treated to such goodies as synopses of episodes that never came to be, letters from people like Steven Allen and Jack “Book ‘em, Danno” Lord explaining how they longed to work on the show, and some truly illuminating trivia (Bill Mumy’s theory about why we don’t get a good look at his two-headed gopher in the “It’s a Good Life” episode comes close enough to answering a question I’ve had for decades).
It’s doubtful that anyone is going to read this book without doing a fair share of skipping around; there is too much tedious minutia about how much sets cost or how much actors were paid. Lack of critiques and details about Serling’s life means you shouldn’t throw away your copies of The Twilight Zone Companion (which Grams accuses of inaccuracy in his introduction) or Serling: The Rise and Twilight of Television’s Last Angry Man, but The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic is an invaluable book to sit on the shelf next to them… assuming you have the space to store this behemoth.
Fortunately, The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic actually is a blast. While I can’t (and wouldn’t want to) fathom the kind of fan who needs to know the brand of typewriter ribbon Rod Serling used, I can’t imagine one who won’t find much of this information fresh and fascinating. In keeping with his neutral approach, Grams’s text is generally pretty dry and academic, but there is plenty of color to be found. Serling’s heated correspondences with writers Charles Beaumont (who accuses the man of plagiarism) and Ray Bradbury (who bitches about rewrites of his script for “I Sing the Body Electric”) are more dramatic than a thousand reality show slap fights and they really draw attention to how underappreciated Serling was in his own camp.
The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic is divided into two parts, the first being a linear history of the program, the second being an exhaustively detailed episode guide (although I was disappointed by the cursory treatment a couple of my favorite episodes received, most notably the fantastic “Jess-Belle” from season four). Along the way, readers are treated to such goodies as synopses of episodes that never came to be, letters from people like Steven Allen and Jack “Book ‘em, Danno” Lord explaining how they longed to work on the show, and some truly illuminating trivia (Bill Mumy’s theory about why we don’t get a good look at his two-headed gopher in the “It’s a Good Life” episode comes close enough to answering a question I’ve had for decades).
It’s doubtful that anyone is going to read this book without doing a fair share of skipping around; there is too much tedious minutia about how much sets cost or how much actors were paid. Lack of critiques and details about Serling’s life means you shouldn’t throw away your copies of The Twilight Zone Companion (which Grams accuses of inaccuracy in his introduction) or Serling: The Rise and Twilight of Television’s Last Angry Man, but The Twilight Zone: Unlocking the Door to a Television Classic is an invaluable book to sit on the shelf next to them… assuming you have the space to store this behemoth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
All written content of Psychobabble200.blogspot.com is the property of Mike Segretto and may not be reprinted or reposted without permission.









