Update: I just received confirmation that my interview about The Who FAQ on WFDU's Vintage
Rock & Pop Shop will be airing on Sunday, May 11. Once again, the show airs at 11am and you can either hear it on your radio dial at 89.1 if you live in the NJ area or you can stream it live at www.wfdu.fm here.
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Review: 'Still the Greatest: The Essential Songs of The Beatles’ Solo Careers'
Perhaps no artist has an output as consistent as that of The
Beatles. With the exception of Yellow
Submarine, which is really an EP of new Beatles material tucked inside of a
George Martin soundtrack album, all of their LPs are essential. When they split
in the seventies and stopped prodding each other to keep that quality level
moon-high, there was a lot more filler. That put them in a most unfortunate
position, since few bands can be reasonably compared to The Beatles, and now
the ex-Beatles were being compared to their former selves. Consequently, the
solo years have increasingly been painted as a wash out by certain fans and
critics.
This isn’t true. In fact, John, Paul, George, and Ringo made
a lot of great music after they ceased to be a unit. You just have to weed
through their output a bit. In his new book Still
the Greatest: The Essential Songs of The Beatles’ Solo Careers, Andrew
Grant Jackson does most of the work for you. The writer cherry picks 182 songs
out of that mass of albums and singles released from McCartney in 1970 right up to Ringo’s Y Not from 2011. The structure is cute: Jackson arranges the songs
as pseudo-post-Beatles-Beatles LPs. For music made before Lennon’s death, he
generally uses the Revolver ratio:
five each by Lennon and McCartney, three by Harrison, one by Starr. He really
does end up covering the mass of the guys’ best post-Beatles songs even though
a selection of their albums (Plastic Ono
Band, All Things Must Pass, RAM, Imagine,
Band on the Run, Ringo) still fully deserve to be heard in their entireties.
However, the bulk of Jackson’s commentary has more to do with the history of
those years than the selected songs, making it quite similar in approach to
Bill Janovitz’s recent Rocks Off: 50
Tracks That Tell the Story of The
Rolling Stones. For the most part, I liked the telling too, though Jackson
does make some missteps along the way. I’m all for using a bit of irreverence
to juice up the storytelling, but he goes way too far when he says that
Lennon’s “big mouth got him killed.” Actually, it was an insane man with a gun
who got Lennon killed, and it’s pretty sick to suggest he was responsible for
his own death in any way.
Sunday, April 20, 2014
20 Things You May Not Have Known About 'Dawn of the Dead'
A decade after dropping the first, full-blown zombie
apocalypse on our heads with Night of the
Living Dead, George Romero got around to showing us what happened next.
This time the thrills were more graphic, thanks to makeup legend Tom Savini and
a full-color presentation, and the satire was sharper. But you already knew
that. In celebration of the 35th anniversary of its U.S. release,
here are 20 Things You May Not Have
Known About Dawn of the Dead!
1. A tour of the
Monroeville Mall by his friend Mark Mason, who managed the establishment, was
most inspirational to George Romero. When Mason mentioned that his mall would
be a good place to hole up during a disaster, Romero started formulating the
plot of his second Living Dead picture. He also ended up filming Dawn of the Dead in the Monroeville
Mall. Other movies with scenes shot there include Flashdance and Zack and Miri
Make a Porno.
2. The mall
scenes in Dawn of the Dead had to be shot between 2 and 5 AM. 2 AM is when the
mall’s final establishment, a tavern, closed for the night. 5 AM is when
cardiac patients were admitted to exercise.
3. The
Monroeville Mall would once again serve as a horrific setting in Stephen King’s
Christine in 1983. A year before that novel
was published, Romero and King collaborated on the portmanteau Creepshow with Romero directing and King
writing and acting. The two horror icons would also meld minds on Romero’s big
screen adaptation of King’s The Dark Half,
though the original plan for Romero to direct King’s It for the small-screen as a seven-hour miniseries fell apart
because of scheduling problems (Tommy Lee Wallace directed the half-as-long
version in 1990 instead). From a Buick 6
was another Romero/King union that withered on the vine, though Romero adaptations
of The Girl who Loved Tom Gordon and Gerald’s Game might still happen. Romero
has already completed scripts for both possible films.
4. While the
political implications of Night of the
Living Dead were essentially an unintended factor caused by the casting of
a black actor, Duane Jones, in the lead, Romero was fully conscious of the
anti-consumerism message of Dawn of the
Dead and continued to infuse all subsequent Living Dead movies with
political themes.
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Review: 'Capturing Archetypes: Twenty Years of Sideshow Collectibles Art'
Sideshow Collectibles are strangely multifaceted for models
of characters from comics and genre movies. Sure, they’re basically scaled down
representations of Darth Vader and Batman and the Alien and Bride of
Frankenstein and The Creature from the Black Lagoon, progeny of the Aurora
models adored by the monster kids of the fifties and sixties. But they are also
exemplars of how seriously the geeks of today take their obsessions. The jocks
can have their cheap plastic football trophies. Sideshow Collectibles are
lovingly, intricately sculpted from assorted materials—resin, polystone, real
cloth and leather, fiberglass. They may depict the icons of alleged low culture,
but they are genuine art pieces, and they’re affixed with big art piece price
tags, which also yokes them with the dubious distinction of being status
symbols too (as of this writing, the most inexpensive item on Sideshow’s
official site is a $69.99 vinyl doll of a character that looks like a licorice
jelly bean called Dolly Colorway; the most expensive are lifesize busts of similar
looking guys called War Machine and Iron Patriot, both running $8999.99). This
means that they are only available to the wealthiest nerds, guys like Guillermo
Del Toro, who pens the introduction to the new coffee table tribute Capturing Archetypes: Twenty Years of
Sideshow Collectibles Art. This book is a far more economical way to
collect these pieces than actually collecting them.
Del Toro offhandedly but insightfully mentions the
“fetishistic” impulses of the collector, and Capturing Archetypes is nothing if not fetishistic. Instead of
depicting the sculptures in flat full view, the book presents them in alluring
shadows, lighting, and smoke, often zooming in on a particular feature or
contour. There is an unabashed gaze on body parts, most obviously in the
leering sculptures and photographs of curvaceous female characters, such as
Catwoman, Molotov Cocktease, Lady Death, Vampira, Elvira, and Jessica
Rabbit—who actually receives her own centerfold!—but also the absurd, veiny
musculature of male characters like Dare Devil, the Hulk, and even Darth Maul. Capturing Geek Porn might have been a
more accurate title for this book, but only the most blinkered critic would
deny the true artistry of the pieces it depicts. And besides, Psychobabble Reader, whose body would
you rather ogle: David’s or Boba Fett’s?
That’s what I thought.
Saturday, April 12, 2014
A Note on Dave Davies, Jimmy Page, Shel Talmy, and 'The Who FAQ'
Nevertheless, I may not have made it sufficiently clear that this was not a fact and that it was merely Talmy's version of what really happened. My source was the producer's interview with Richie Unterberger in his book Urban Spacemen and Wayfaring Strangers. In fact, Jimmy Page himself denies playing on the song, which you can in this piece on soundonsound.com here, and in this same piece, Talmy says he does not remember whether or not Page played on the track, further revealing his own shaky grasp on the history of the creation of "You Really Got Me". Once again, the truth is that Page did not play any guitar on "You Really Got Me" whatsoever, nor did he have anything to do with the sound or tone of Dave's guitar. I hope that readers of The Who FAQ will understand that I never intended to indicate otherwise. Talmy's false memory will not appear in future editions of The Who FAQ, including the upcoming Kindle edition.
Obviously, Dave continues to be one of my top Rock & Roll heroes and The Kinks continue to be one of my very favorite bands.
Thursday, April 10, 2014
Review: The Criterion Edition of 'Breaking the Waves'
After starting his career with a series of highly stylized
films, Lars von Trier made Breaking the
Waves, his first after co-founding the Dogma 95 movement, which preached
absolute austerity: only location and handheld shooting, only contemporary
settings, no non-diegetic sound or optical manipulation, no superficial action,
no credit for the director, etc. Typically, he had trouble even playing by his
own rules, and von Trier’s break-through film arrived without Dogma
95-certification, largely because of the hyper-stylized, digitally-colored
chapter titles accompanied by non-diegetic pop songs by the likes of Jethro
Tull, David Bowie, and Elton John to establish the seventies time period.
Monday, March 31, 2014
Review: Mono Vinyl Reissues of Harry Nilsson's 'Pandemonium Shadow Show' and 'Aerial Ballet'
At the very, very end of the hallucinogenic year of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band,
Rock’s Pied Piper released an album so radical it inspired all of his
underlings to abandon their sitars and Mellotrons and get back to Rock &
Roll’s rustic roots. Dylan’s John Wesley
Harding actually wasn’t that radical considering that Rock & Roll had
always been cyclical and always would be. It was inevitable that someone would
eventually lead the pack away from psychedelic fads (in fact, Dylan’s album
wasn’t really even the first back-to-the roots record of late ’67; The Beach
Boys’ Wild Honey was).
For a truly radical late-1967 album, check out Harry
Nilsson’s RCA debut, Pandemonium Shadow
Show. It’s as psychedelic and as rootsy as a Stephen Sondheim musical, yet
it houses trappings of both pre-and-post John
Wesley Harding pop. Nilsson’s cover of The Beatles’ “You Can’t Do That”
encapsulates this perfectly by quoting a dozen tracks by the kings of
psychedelia to a back porch rhythm section of acoustic guitar and bongos.
Nilsson mapped out a totally individual pop approach by tarting up such
unfashionable styles as jazz, lounge, olde tyme brass band, and Broadway with
wiseass humor. He made it more than mere novelty by interpreting this material
with a truly gorgeous voice, often laid down in blankets of flawless overdubbed
harmony. Even tarter, he undercuts all the offhand satire with “1941”, a stark,
breath-snatching piece about the daddy issues that haunted his life and work.
This topic plops down at the very start of Nilsson’s second
RCA album, 1968’s Aerial Ballet, as
“Daddy’s Song” (later made famous by The Monkees in their movie Head, leading him from cutting the track
from second pressings of Aerial Ballet).
Despite the ironically light approach of this track, the rest of the album is
less comic than Pandemonium Shadow Show
and more of a personal artistic statement. The previous album had been evenly divided
between covers and Nilsson originals. The new one only contained a single
cover, a version of Fred Neil’s “Everybody’s Talkin’” that ended up being its
most well-known track when John Schlesinger used it in Midnight Cowboy. Nilsson’s own composition “One” would be an even
bigger hit when covered by Three Dog Night the following year.
Pandemonium Shadow
Show and Aerial Ballet are both
lovely, melancholically funny, and emotionally tender records, and both were
released just as mono was falling out of favor, leaving the stereo mixes far
more common. Sundazed Records has unearthed the mono versions for new 180 gram
vinyl reissues produced with all due love, respect, and authenticity (even the
RCA label’s are retained). Two of the most unique records of the late sixties
are now more unique than ever.
Friday, March 28, 2014
Review: 'The Ashgate Encyclopedia of Literary and Cinematic Monsters'
You know you’re not reading a typical encyclopedia when it
starts with a quote from Bugs Bunny. Nevertheless, The Ashgate Encyclopedia of Literary and Cinematic Monsters earns
its name, covering an array of fantastic creatures in a single, monstrous
625-page volume. Editor Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock whittled his initial list of
1,000 monsters down to about 200, but because some of those entries are very
wide-ranging (Animals, Monstrous; Bible, Monsters in The; Women,
Monstrous) Weinstock’s contributors check a lot more than 200 off the list.
With that multitude of contributors comes a multitude of approaches, some more
successful than others, to studying creatures from Angel to Zombie.
Some of the most pervasive monsters— Demon, Extraterrestrial, Ghost,
Witch/Wizard—comprise a sizeable chunk of the book with multiple
contributors exhaustively detailing how they have been portrayed in books,
films, TV shows, comics, and games
throughout world history. Some get more attention than they deserve (Brownie
is a slightly longer entry than Devil, The, Dracula, or Frankenstein’s
Monster). At least one of the most essential and influential monsters—Hyde,
Edward—is absurdly short-changed, the most essential and influential of his
films—Rouben Mamoulian’s 1931 adaptation— not receiving any mention at all. Some
entries are little more than lists of books and films with microscopic synopses
and little in the way of historical background or analysis (Death,
Personified, for example).
Most entries, however, strike a strong balance between the
histories, insightful analyses, and lists of examples we expect of an authoritative
encyclopedia. There are no significant absences and plenty to discover in the
way of relatively unfamiliar creatures, such as Devil-Bug, the monster
doorman from George Lippard’s The Monks
of Monk Hall, the soothsaying Donestre of the Middle Ages, the
child-killing Empousa of ancient Greek folklore, the world-creating
ocean goddess Tiamat, a big Kosher bird called Ziz, and Kappa,
a goofy-looking Japanese swamp monster that pulls kids’ internal organs out
through their butts.
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Review: 'Batman: The Silver Age Dailies and Sundays 1966-1967'
Batman has existed in a swarm of guises. He’s been a comic
book and a campy live-action TV series and a Saturday morning cartoon and a
Mego action figure and more than one movie franchise. One of the guy’s
lesser-discussed incarnations is his turn as a newspaper comic strip. Batman
first popped up in your local paper in 1943, only lasting there a few years
before flapping back to the funny books. He had more success during his return
run from 1966 to 1970 thanks to Adam West and Burt Ward.
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Review: 'Steven Spielberg and Duel: The Making of a Film Career'
By the fourth quarter of the twentieth century, TV had
overtaken movies as America’s number one entertainment for good, so it is fitting
that the number one moviemaker of that period got his start on the little
screen. Steven Spielberg was a TV junkie who’d made his name directing episodes
of “Marcus Welby, M.D.”, “Columbo”, and most famously, “Rod Serling’s Night
Gallery” when he was still barely old enough to drink. In 1971, he got his
first break into feature-length movie making, though Duel was consigned to his usual living room-based medium. Spielberg’s
ABC movie-of-the-week adaptation of Richard Matheson’s short story, however,
revealed a big screen talent. This brutally minimalistic showdown between a
suburban schlub and a literal monster truck was filmed with all the
consideration and imagination of a major motion picture. That may not sound
like a big deal in the day of “Mad Men” and “Game of Thrones”, but it was
completely revolutionary in an age when TV movies were low-budget, disposable
filler between episodes of “The Brady Bunch” and “The Courtship of Eddie’s
Father”. In fact, Duel was so high
quality that it earned a critically smashing feature run in Europe. Spielberg’s
career as a TV director was coming to an end.
Duel is not
generally mentioned among Spielberg’s signature films, but based on this above brief
history, I’m sure you’ll understand its significance. If you need any further
convincing, check out Steven Awalt’s excellent new book Steven Spielberg and Duel: The Making of a Film Career. Awalt gets
deep into this film’s creation, from the inspiration for and publication of
Matheson’s story to the film’s eventual American theatrical run in 1983 in the
wake of Spielberg’s domination of cinemas with E.T. The history is complete, amusing (the “casting” of the
automobiles is documented here, as is the Incredible Hulk’s theft of Duel footage), critical (though mostly
of Awalt’s fellow Duel theorists), and
often just as thrilling as the film it details. The author relates Matheson’s
near-death experience that inspired his tale and Spielberg’s boyhood short
movie about a head-on collision between model trains with a master
storyteller’s grasp of suspense. He also really emphasizes the importance of
master storyteller Richard Matheson in this history. Because Duel is so significant a milestone in
Spielberg’s career, Matheson’s major role in its creation is often minimized.
Not so in this book, which also contains that writer’s complete teleplay for
his and Spielberg’s film. So this book functions as both an informative—and
very entertaining—resource for students of Spielberg and a nice tribute to the
recently deceased Richard Matheson.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
All written content of Psychobabble200.blogspot.com is the property of Mike Segretto and may not be reprinted or reposted without permission.









