A husband who prefers reading sci-fi pulp mags to having sex
with his eager wife escapes into a fantasy in which he is an intergalactic
castaway in the year 2069. He boards the USS Erection so he can peep on or participate
in the erotic frolics of the starship’s crew. Doesn’t sound familiar? That’s
because David Friedman’s z-grade softcore porno Space Thing is such a piece of forgettable garbage that it hasn’t
even earned an imdb page. It has, however, earned a new soundtrack album on
silver vinyl from Modern Harmonic. Is the music better than the movie? Well, if
you dig poorly recorded, generic go-go jazz with lots of palm-muted guitar and Hammond
organ riffs—occasionally overlaid with the film’s terrible dialogue and
half-hearted panting—then I guess the answer is “yes.” By any yardstick,
listening to William Castleman’s score (recycled from not Friedman’s She Freak) is less excruciatingly boring
than watching Space Thing, which is
included on DVD courtesy of Something Weird Video as a bonus booby prize.
Thursday, March 28, 2019
Monday, March 25, 2019
Review: 'The Beatles through a Glass Onion: Reconsidering the White Album'
Right behind its status as the most sprawling and eclectic
of The Beatles’ albums, “The White Album” is best known as The Beatles’ most
fragmented record. It is known as the album on which the Fab Four essentially
became four fab individuals masterminding their own sessions while either using
the other three guys as backing musicians or approaching each track as a
veritable solo endeavor.
Ironically, The
Beatles through a Glass Onion: Reconsidering the White Album is one of the
most cohesive multiple-author essay collections I’ve ever read. In fact, most
of its thirteen essays read more like chapters in a single-author work. Each of
those section shares the same seriousness, competence, impersonal tone,
clarity, and tendency to quote large chunks of other authors’ works. This lends
the book a straight readability that the usual inconsistent multiple-author
collection does not offer. More than one author even shares the same quirks,
such as the inclination to compare “The White Album” to Joyce’s Ulysses and the mistaken belief that “Why
Don’t We Do It in the Road” immediately follows “I Will”.
The stylistic consistency of The Beatles through a Glass Onion would be little more than mildly
interesting if the authors didn’t unite to provide an illuminating portrait of
an album that has already been very widely discussed. Yet they accomplish this
by keenly examining all of the album’s key components—its writing, its
recording, its cast of characters, its politics, its unique contributions by the
four individual Beatles, etc.
Towards the end of the book there are quirkier chapters on the
album’s influence that begin to buck the uniformity of all the preceded it. These
includes discussions of Tori Amos and U2’s covers of “Happiness Is a Warm Gun” (one
of the more academic chapters) and Danger Mouse’s mash up of “The White
Album’s” and Jay Z’s The Black Album
(a slightly more lyrical chapter than the others). Because they are about less
essential topics, the mild stylistic variations are fitting rather than jarring
and help widen the perspective of an album with a particularly sprawling world
view.
Thursday, March 21, 2019
Review: 'I Wanna Hold Your Hand' Blu-ray
American teenagers as a culture force came into their own in
the 1950s, and as always, the white/middle-aged forces in control were
instantly threatened, trying to demonize kids with the over-stated “juvenile
delinquency” scare of that decade. However, the combined power of Elvis
Presley, James Dean, and the Crypt Keeper could not equal what happened to
teens in 1964. They screamed like they were being murdered. They peed their
pants. They threw themselves in front of and out of moving vehicles. They lost
complete and total control. This crazed behavior was a consequence of three of
the things the older generation most feared: sex, Rock & Roll, and
foreigners. Those foreigners in question were four youngsters from Liverpool,
England, and though The Beatles projected a seemingly wholesome image,
teenagers correctly interpreted the licentious messages of Rock & Roll like
“Please Please Me”, “Twist and Shout”, and even “I Want to Hold Your Hand”. Consequently,
they went cuckoo.
Monday, March 18, 2019
Review: 'Best. Movie. Year. Ever.: How 1999 Blew up the Big Screen'
Defining any year as the “best ever” for movies can’t come
off as anything but hyperbolic, and you’d be right to be wary of a book called Best. Movie. Year. Ever.: How 1999 Blew up
the Big Screen when there’s a picture of Jar Jar Binks on its cover. Yet hyperbole
or even making a case for all-time-greatness status is not the point of Brian
Raftery’s new book. Best. Movie. Year.
Ever.is a zippy history of a year in which films may not have always been
great but very often blasted off into bold new directions. As awful as The Phantom Menace was, you cannot argue
that it wasn’t a prescient indicator of the kinds of movies that currently
dominate cinemas. Several that year were equally prophetic, as The Matrix predicted the Internet’s
mass-mesmerism, Election put its
finger on how much of a sloppy mess the political process was about to become, Run Lola Run solidified the influence
video games continue to wield over cinema, and The Blair Witch Project introduced the inescapable found-footage
genre.
Friday, March 15, 2019
Review: '“Twice the Thrills! Twice the Chills!” Horror and Science Fiction Double Features, 1955-1974'
Cinema had to scramble when a new invasive species called
television sprouted up in the 1950s. Big budget production companies dealt with
the new threat by making the kinds of big, boisterous, Technicolor epics
television could never match. Small budget companies countered with cagey
gimmicks, such as 3D, Aroma-rama, and Emergo. More practical, slightly less
desperate, and certainly more enduring was the practice of renting two films
for the price of one to theaters. Thus, the double feature was officially born.
Movie goers could buy one ticket to take in a pair of AIPs like A Bucket of Blood and The Giant Leeches, a pair of Hammers
like Dracula, Prince of Darkness and Plague of the Zombies, a European
art-horror like Les Yeux Sans Visage matched
with a schlocker like The Manster, or
an odd couple like Rosemary’s Baby and
The Odd Couple.
Bryan Senn’s new book “Twice
the Thrills! Twice the Chills!” Horror and Science Fiction Double Features, 1955-1974
pays tribute to the double-decade year period when creepy, kooky double
features ruled matinees. This thick volume is not quite a film guide—the
entries on each double-bill are way too long and way too loaded with production
information. It’s not quite a history—only a 12-page introduction and brief
paragraphs prefacing each entry deal with double bills directly. Whatever it
is, it’s a ball. Senn does what a topic such as this deserves. His synopses,
historical details, and choices of anecdotes are consistently entertaining and
a sufficiently sarcastic, reflecting the fun of scarfing down a bucket of
popcorn while devouring delightful crap like The Brain That Wouldn’t Die and sneaking out of the theater before
having to suffer through Invasion of the
Star Creatures. His cheeky critiques are spot on, and when he and I
disagree, he makes totally fair arguments for his points of view. Sometimes his
jokey comments are sheer corn, but that suits the atmosphere of B-grade
merriment too. The package is nicely illustrated with B&W images of lobby
cards, posters, and press-book pages. Maybe it’s no longer easy to hunt down an
actual double feature in your local theater, but “Twice the Thrills! Twice the Chills!” is such a blast that it will
likely inspire you to host one in your own home.
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Review: 'The Nosferatu Story: The Seminal Horror Film, Its Predecessors, and Its Enduring Legacy'
Nosferatu may be
the first horror feature that really feels like one. Based on one of horror’s
top-three essential texts, featuring an iconic portrayal of one of the
top-three essential monsters, and brought to life with dank, Gothic atmosphere, F.W. Murnau’s Dracula
adaptation is historically significant and still very scary after nearly a
century. The film’s making is also well worth deep discussion and very
deserving of a book with a title like The
Nosferatu Story: The Seminal Horror Film, Its Predecessors, and Its Enduring
Legacy.
Unfortunately, that title ended up on book that is
disjointed and flimsy. The Nosferatu
Story feels like excerpts from essays about early German cinema sutured
together in a way more reminiscent of Mary Shelley than Bram Stoker. Author
Rolf Giesen fails to tie together his various discussions in a way that tells a
satisfying, linear story. He dwells on odd things and skims over essentials. There
are thirty pages of discussion of films such as The Golem and The Cabinet of
Dr. Caligari before Giesen gets to Nosferatu.
Then there are another thirty pages of pointless plot description, which is a
major issue in a book that is only 210 pages long (and 75 of those pages are
devoted to filmographies and appendices). Perhaps the most well known detail of
the Nosferatu story is Stoker’s widow
Florence’s accusations of copyright violations against the film and the
subsequent court decision that demanded every copy of Murnau’s film be
destroyed. Instead of unearthing interesting new details about this key part of
his story, Giesen darts through it in three brief paragraphs. He does, however,
set aside an entire paragraph of his slim book to relay every person director
Tony Watt thanks in the credits of some movie called Nosferatu vs. Father Pipecock & Sister Funk.
There are interesting chunks of The Nosferatu Story: The Seminal Horror Film, Its Predecessors, and Its
Enduring Legacy —particularly a brief but fascinating biography of star Max
Schreck, who applied his own makeup for his portrayal of the rat-like Count
Orlock and enjoyed a rich stage career, and everything pertaining to the film's occultist producer, Albin Grau— but the overall telling of that story
is much too unfocused to earn its enticing title.
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Farewell, Hal Blaine
Blaine was also a big personality, as evidenced in the numerous documentaries to which he contributed his memories, such as The Wrecking Crew! and Beautiful Dreamer: Brian Wilson and the Story of SMiLE. Sadly, the world just lost that beat and that personality because Hal Blaine died at the age of 90 yesterday. You can't say the guy didn't live a full life though.
Monday, March 11, 2019
Review: 'American International Pictures: A Comprehensive Filmography'
In the sixties, James H. Nicholson and Samuel Z. Arkoff’s
American International Pictures was best known for pumping out a series of
dopey beach party flicks, Roger Corman’s elegant Poe adaptations, and a gonzo
slew of fab B-grade genre pictures. However, AIP was even more eclectic than
that, distributing prestige foreign films such as The Umbrellas of Cherbourg and La
Dolce Vita and films by Robert Altman and Orson Welles and trafficking in Mondo-style
documentaries and borderline porno. In all, AIP and its subsidiaries had their
talons in over 800 movies. With his new book American International Pictures: A Comprehensive Filmography, Rob
Craig attempts to catalog them all. This would be quite the project if Craig
had merely tracked down all the titles and listed them, but he goes way farther
than that with encyclopedia-like entries for each film, some of which fill
entire pages. He covers interesting production details, describes plots, and
offers personal critiques and a good deal of sub-textual analysis.
This is where American
International Pictures: A Comprehensive Filmography serves its most useful
purpose, since the book mainly functions as a film guide. I can usually get a
pretty good handle on how much a film-guide writer and I see eye-to-eye and how
likely I will be to dig that writer’s recommendations. However, Rob Craig is a
tough call. He’s generally politically astute, writes well, and loves many
oddball movies deserving of love, but he’s too hell bent on iconoclasm, which
is something he signals in an introduction that explicitly challenges notions
that some films are or aren’t objectively good. That’s fine, but I can’t get on
board with some of Craig’s kookier ideas. I agree with him that Peter Sasdy’s The Devil within Her is a lot of fun,
but Craig’s conclusion that it is better than Rosemary’s Baby—a deliberately hilarious film he categorizes as
“humorless”—is crazy (Polanski’s still a horrible person though). He thinks Starcrash
is better than Star Wars (another
movie he dismisses as “humorless) and can’t stand beloved character actor Dick
Miller, yet he finds much to admire in crap such as the tedious Blood from the Mummy’s Tomb, the vile Cry of the Banshee, the inept and vile The Last House on the Left, and the shrill, painfully unfunny Comedy of Terrors, which he believes has
“hilarious” dialogue. Who is this guy?
And wait ’til you read his entries on The T.A.M.I. Show and The Big
TNT Show! He is merciless in his castigation of some of the sixties’
greatest acts, dismissing The Beach Boys as a “pathetic” boy band, deeming The
Lovin’ Spoonful “bizarre,” trashing The Rolling Stones and The Byrds, and
having little patience for James Brown, whose performance once inspired an
entire movie theater audience to leap up in the aisles and dance (I was there).
His chastising of the film’s use of some chaste go-go dancers as “perverted” is
way more bizarre than anything the Spoonful ever did. Yet, I agreed with Craig
in enough instances that I still managed to compile a list of films I’d like to
check out on his recommendation. He certainly does a good job of making the movies
he likes sound intriguing. Whether or not I enjoy them may be another matter.
Thursday, March 7, 2019
Review: 'The Golden Age of Science Fiction'
Science Fiction had existed at least since the nineteenth
century when fantasists such as Mary Shelley and Jules Verne imagined a technologically
advanced, sometimes horrific future. However, the genre positively exploded
during the 1950s as the world became fixated on atomic energy, UFOs, and the very
real possibility of conquering space. Suddenly cinemas were overrun with little
green men; pulp novels and comic books dripped with lurid images of hulking
robots carrying away scantly clad damsels; the new medium of TV offered small,
blurry tales of tomorrow; and at least in England, soon-to-be-extinct radio
dramas hung on by spinning similar sci-fi stories.
John Wade pays tribute to the decade’s various imaginative
fictions in his breezy new book The
Golden Age of Science Fiction. In five chapters each devoted to radio,
television, film, books, and periodicals, respectively, Wade gives a run down
of the major fictions of the era. Because he is English, he offers a
perspective that often strays from the most commonly discussed fictions of the
fifties. Wade shines when discussing
such British artifacts as Nigel “Quatermass” Kneale’s TV work (particularly
since he bolsters the discussion with tidbits from his own interviews with
Kneale), Dan Dare—a sort of British Buck Rogers, and British radio series such
as Journey into Space. His chapters
on film and long fiction are less riveting because they focus on such
well-covered topics as The Day the Earth
Stood Still, Invasion of the Body
Snatchers, Ray Bradbury, and Arthur C. Clarke and depend too much on long
synopses of films and books that are more interesting to actually watch and read.
Yet the author offers enough critique to give these chapters some sense of
purpose.
I also liked Wade’s personal point of view, which lends a
nostalgic air to this study of a particularly nostalgia-stimulating topic. Wade
shares autobiographical stories of discovering science fiction as a fifties kid
and the complex process of sneaking into X movies (settle down…an X rating
implied something very different in the UK). Best of all is the abundance of
high quality, full-color photos of pulp mag and comics covers, film posters,
spectacular sculptures of the Mekon from the Dan Dare stories, Robbie the
Robot, and other items that will transport you back to the fifties’ deliciously
distinct vision of things to come.
Monday, March 4, 2019
Review: The Zombies' 'In the Beginning'
The Zombies released two of the best hit singles of the
British Invasion and one of the best LPs of all time, but their career on wax
was weirdly sporadic. After putting out those two smashes—“She’s Not There” and
“Tell Her No”—in 1964, and their eponymous debut album the following year, The
Zombies did not manage to make another substantial hit single or album until
1968 when they finally put out Odessey
and Oracle (recorded in 1967). The 45 it yielded—“Time of the
Season”—didn’t even get any radio action until 1969. Yet the band did record a
fair share of material in between those epochal bookends.
Friday, March 1, 2019
Review: 'EC Comics: Race, Shock & Social Protest'
In the 1950s, truthful depictions of bigotry in the U.S.
were almost completely absent in pop culture. Shockingly, one of the few places
where indictments of racism, anti-semitism, and other forms of prejudice could
be found (if only sporadically) was in the controversial Shock Suspenstories of EC comics, which were
so often denigrated as harmful to youth and generally disgusting. There
were tales of racist harassment and mob violence with very explicitly stated
morals. In “The Whipping” from ShockSuspenstories,
a racist accidentally beats his own daughter to death think that he is actually
attacking her Hispanic boyfriend. In “Hate!”, a drooling anti-semite impels a
Jewish couple to kill themselves before discovering that his own biological
parents were Jewish. In “Judgment Day!” from Weird Fantasy, a valiant astronaut who turns out to be African
American instills hope in robots existing in a segregated society. These
stories were told with the same unflinching audacity and ironic denouements of
EC’s more celebrated crypt tales of oozing corpses and gore-devouring creeps.
Qiana Whitted’s EC
Comics: Race, Shock & Social Protest is the first book-length study of
how EC comics dealt with race. Whitted analyzes the characters, the artist’s
depictions of those characters, and such recurring themes as how the villains
of these pieces tend to receive their comeuppances via a crippling sense of
shame rather than EC’s usual ironic dismemberings. She often refers to the
letters sections in these books to assess the effectiveness of the preaching in
EC’s so-called “preachies.” The crass bluntness of the readers who did not
appreciate these anti-racism messages is more shocking than any act of violence
in the stories.
Whitted is generally and rightly complimentary of EC’s bravery
in its depictions of race issues at a time when such things were not discussed
in popular entertainments, though she also rightfully criticizes the comics’
tendency to reduce its black characters to victims with neither personalities
nor voices— vehicles for delivering a message of intolerance and altering the
lives of the white bigots who are usually the real main characters of the preachies.
Whitted also points out that EC could be guilty of the same kinds
of broad racial stereotypes common to the fifties when spinning yarns of voodoo
and zombies, but the overall tone of EC
Comics: Race, Shock & Social Protest is reasonably celebratory. It is also
highly readable and attractively put together, illustrating Whitted’s points with
numerous full-color panels from EC comics. While it may find its most natural
home in the classroom, EC Comics: Race,
Shock & Social Protest is a book that everyone interested in comics
history should check out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
All written content of Psychobabble200.blogspot.com is the property of Mike Segretto and may not be reprinted or reposted without permission.