Watching Mike Nesmith's recent Q&A at the 2014 Monkees Convention sent me down a rabbit hole of Monkees-related videos. The most interesting one brought Davy Jones (who treats us to a terrifying Joe Cocker impersonation) together with a member of another favorite group when he appeared on "Pop Quiz" as part of John Entwistle's team in October 1984. Rounding out the Ox's team and serving as trivia secret weapon is Feargal Sharkey of the great Irish pop-punk group The Undertones. The opposition unites Cheryl Baker of Bucks Fizz and Tony Butler of Big Country (who also worked with John's band mates Pete Townshend and Roger Daltrey and also does Cocker), on a team helmed by Dave Dee.
As a bonus, here's Nez's talk at the convention:
...and here's an extra bonus--Peter Tork taking a member of David Letterman's audience on a date in 1982 before sitting down and chatting with the host:
Anyone have a cool Micky Dolenz video they'd like to recommend?
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
Review: '33 1/3: The Beach Boys’ Smile'
There are two excellent books about The Beach Boys’ “lost”
masterpiece SMiLE, both very
different and both by Domenic Priore. Look!
Listen! Vibrate! Smile! is a scrapbook of period articles and more recent
essays chronicling the anticipation leading up to a release that never happened
and the cultish (though deserved) fan obsession that followed. SMiLE: The Story of Brian Wilson’s Lost
Masterpiece is a more straight forward biographical look at the record that
takes us up to Wilson’s solo recreation of it from 2004. Since the SMiLE story didn’t end there—The Beach
Boys have since did the once unimaginable by sanctioning the release of a
wealth of the original sessions in a deluxe box set—a third book on this
particular record is not necessarily unnecessary. The SMiLE Sessions opens the story further by providing a more
thorough portrait of the music and its making than most people previously heard
and finally providing some closure to this uniquely open-ended story. However,
Luis Sanchez doesn’t get into that in his installment of the 33 1/3 series. In
fact, his Smile doesn’t really deal
with SMiLE much at all, at least not
for the first 88 pages of his 118-page book. Those pages are spent with each
Beach Boys record leading up to SMiLE.
They are discussed with light criticism and basic history most fans will
already know. When Sanchez finally gets around to the ostensible subject of his
book, he gives SMiLE a bit more
attention than Surfin’ USA or The Beach Boys Christmas Album but not
nearly enough to satisfy. I applaud the writer for not falling into the worst
traps that 33 1/3 writers sometimes tumble into. His book is not preciously
personal. It is not inaccessibly academic for a book on pop music. It does not eschew
The Beach Boys for tangential discussions on agrarian economics or Vampire
Weekend. However, this simply is not a book about a single album, which is
supposed to be the purpose of the 33 1/3 series. It’s a brief history of The
Beach Boys on record from 1961 through 1966 finished off with a decent but
general essay on SMiLE that touches a
little on the album’s troubled history, a little on Van Dyke Parks’s
consequential contributions, a little on its themes and sounds, and a little on
its more recent rebirth. While it is not satisfying as a 33 1/3 book, Smile certainly isn’t bad as an
early-Beach Boys primer. I don’t think Domenic Priore is going to lose any
sleep over this one though.
Monday, May 19, 2014
The Mother of Sci-Fi Movie Franchises Was Also the Darkest
Warning: The Spoilers
will damn you all to hell.
Star Wars gets all
the credit for being the first major science-fiction movie franchise, segueing
off into a plastic avalanche of every product imaginable from the ubiquitous
toys to clothing, house wares, books, hygiene products, food, and so on and so on.
First appearing a decade before George Lucas’s juggernaut, Planet of the Apes wasn’t quite as over-commercialized as its
successor (what is?), but kids could still get their paws on a plethora of Apey
action figures, mugs and bowls, t-shirts, comics, puzzles, piggy banks, Ben
Cooper Halloween costumes, and so on. They could also get a healthy dose of
harsh reality by actually watching the movies. Forget Darth Vader’s
traumatizing revelation in The Empire
Strikes Back and even all the skin-charring nastiness and off-screen
“youngling” killing of Revenge of the
Sith. The Planet of the Apes
series is by far the darkest, downright cruelest film franchise ever pitched at
kids.
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
Review: '33 1/3: Liz Phair's Exile in Guyville'
When the term “women in rock” became an inescapable buzz
phrase around 1993, the women to which that label applied—Polly Jean Harvey,
Kim Deal, Tanya Donelly, and Juliana Hatfield, to name a few—often reacted to questions
about it with irritation, bugged that lazy journalists were reducing their
considerable musical achievements to gender matters. Their irritation was
completely legitimate, yet the Rock scene was becoming more gender-balanced
than it ever had been before, and to ignore that would have been to pass on a
pretty noteworthy story. It was a frustrating inevitability for the talented
musicians who had to field the same tired questions about their gender over and
over and over again.
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Ten Outstanding Performances in David Lynch Works
David Lynch a master of conjuring uncanny, dreamy atmosphere,
of terrifying viewers with films that aren’t quite horror movies, of blending
genres into swirling nightmares that defy pat analysis. This is the stuff of
which the term “Lynchian” is made. But let’s not forget that he is also an
expert conductor of actresses and actors, and he has superb taste in them
despite his cheeky use of specimens like Billy Ray Cyrus every now and then. The
emotional and logical demands of a David Lynch script require remarkably
talented interpreters and very often result in thoroughly unique, flat-out
stunning performances. Here are ten of the greatest.
1. Jack Nance as Henry Spencer in Eraserhead
Jack Nance would deserve a place on this list if for nothing
but his commitment. Eraserhead
famously took five years to make as Lynch kept running out of money. That meant
Nance had to both remain in character for five years and wear Henry
Spencer’s—ummm—distinctive hair style
for five years. Nance’s work in the film is far more than that though. With a
bare minimum of dialogue, he relies on his subtly expressive face and
masterfully controlled body language to convey the real emotion roiling away
beneath Henry’s placid surface as he contends with his monstrous, mocking baby.
The slightest smile conveys a flash of fatherly pride, the upturn of eyebrows
conveys his despondency with his lot in life, his restful expression at the end
of the film let’s us know that he finally feels loved, and it is a most moving
climax. And when Nance does speak, his choked delivery draws out the film’s
humor and sadness with expert balance. Lynch regards Nance as one of the most
expert actors with whom he’s ever worked and handed roles in almost all of his
films to Nance until the actor’s death in 1996.
2. Freddie Jones as
Bytes in The Elephant Man
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
All written content of Psychobabble200.blogspot.com is the property of Mike Segretto and may not be reprinted or reposted without permission.